A
few points on using
protective filters on camera lenses. Here, I will be talking about
using filters for protecting lens front elements, irrespective of other
functions that filters may also perform (haze reduction, polarizing
etc.)
There
are two main schools: the filter-off school,
including some prominent nature photographers, advocates not using
filters at all, unless one can justify why a filter is
(occasionally) necessary. The filter-on school says keep filters on. My
personal view is that, in uncontrolled environments, for example
outdoors, dusty factories, little kids running around with ice cream in
their hands, it is better to keep filters on,
unless there is a justifiable reason to (occasionally) take them off.
For example, a deposit of dirt/dust/salt on a filter that is hard to
clean
quickly may justify removing the filter, taking a few photos and then
putting the filter on until there is a chance to
clean the filter properly. If continuing taking images in this specific
situation is an overriding priority, it may even make
sense keeping the filter off until the cleaning time and
temporary
protecting the lens front element by other means, for example
a
lens cap, a glove over the lens hood, a plastic bag etc.
I have had lots of various stuff
deposited on my filters that I would not want to see on (and clean
from) lens front elements. At least some modern lenses have special
coatings on front elements that are quite easy to scratch (trust me
on this one). While it might be possible to clean lens front elements
without any damage in a controlled environment, trying to remove
nasty stuff from the front element quickly in the field would be a
risky business.
More
expensive protective filters also have
some coatings on, to reduce reflections; however, filters are usually
much cheaper than
lenses. If I scratch a filter, and the scratch affects the
image quality, I just get a new filter keeping the old one for
especially dirty shooting conditions.
By
the way, I test my
filters, especially if I suspect that the filter might be seriously
degrading the image quality. One of the obvious signs is a lower
contrast: the image may
look washed out. Some years ago, I have tried one of my favourite super
zooms from film days on a digital body and was very disappointed by the
lack of contrast. I was almost ready to dismiss the lens as not
compatible with digital cameras. Out of curiosity, I have
removed the filter and taken a few images again: they all came out
contrast and sharp (see below). The filter was at fault. In that case,
cleaning
the filter thoroughly has improved the image significantly. However,
this specific lens still works noticeably better without any filter.

Original image: filter on

Image
captured a few minutes later (cropped), after removing the filter
And
this brings me to a very important point. Placing any protective filter
on a lens, even the most
expensive multi-coated, sparkle-clean and straight out of the box, will
degrade the image quality. In
controlled environments, for example a portrait studio or an office, it
makes a perfect sense to photograph without filters, with
the hood on, if available. In fact, hoods provide a certain additional
level of protection in most cases and I prefer to keep them on even if
photographing with protective filters.
In
case of any concerns about the extent of image degradation when using
protective filters, I suggest going to a store and trying several
different filters on, writing down file names and filters used.
Take images of the same object from the same position and in
the
same lighting environment keeping the framing unchanged. Then come back
home and check the results on your computer screen. If you find a
filter that causes no noticeable image degradation, you might have a
winner! Various lenses may respond differently to the same filter: make
sure you check all the lenses that you are planning to fit this filter
on.
Finally,
what about the image of a shattered filter at the beginning of this
post? This one was on my lens that was attached to a camera and packed
inside a camera bag. When jumping off a truck with my bag in one hand,
it hit the ground, not hard but noticeable. Something inside the bag,
or maybe a sharp rock on the ground, must have punctured the glass. The
lens was OK: I only needed to blow off the glass fragments from the
front element: no noticeable damage!
May 2014